I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Материалы по теме:
，这一点在safew官方下载中也有详细论述
典型案例三：蓝田县西安农投15万吨粮仓项目。关于这个话题，WPS下载最新地址提供了深入分析
泰国第四大人口府孔敬府，借鉴中国“精准扶贫”理念，当地官员感慨“提供了解决贫困问题的勇气”。菌草技术在100多个国家“点草成金”。第七十三届联合国大会通过关于消除农村贫困问题的决议，把“精准扶贫”理念明确写入其中。中国的发展不仅改变了自己，也改变了世界。
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用